Legal Opinion
McAfee v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
District Court, E.D. California
Decided December 12, 2008No. CIV. 05-00227 WBS KJMPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
WILLIAM B. SHUBB, District Judge.
Plaintiff Ryan McAfee and defendant Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (“MetLife”) dispute the value of plaintiffs performance-based stock options for purposes of calculating his monthly disability benefits. On November 17, 2008, the matter was tried to the court, sitting without a jury. The following memorandum constitutes the court’s findings of fact and con elusions of law pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 52(a).
I. Factual and Procedural History
A. Background
Plaintiff was Vice President of Research at PeopleSoft Inc. in…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Pennsylvania v. Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean AirSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. GlennSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- (PC) Penton v. HubardDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
- Benson v. Continental Casualty Co.District Court, C.D. California · 2008
- Monroe v. Metropolitan Life Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022