Legal Opinion
May v. City Nat. Bank & Trust Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided June 23, 1953No. 35633PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAMS, Justice.
Parties are referred to herein as in the trial court.
Plaintiff May sued defendant City National Bank and Trust Company for about $6,000, alleging a set of facts substantially as follows:
May was engaged in the livestock commission business in Oklahoma City; pursuant to a custom of the business, May furnished capital to one Jones, who was known in the business as a “clearee”. Jones used the capital to buy and sell cattle . as an independent trader; he kept all profits and sustained all losses, paying May a commission per head for the use of the capital. -On three dates named…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Meshek v. CordesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- National Union Bank v. Miller Rubber Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1925
- Fibikowski v. FibikowskiSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- Bell-Wayland Co. v. Bank of SugdenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- California Stucco Co. v. Marine National BankWashington Supreme Court · 1928
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- OSAGE NATION v. BD. OF COMMISSIONERS OF OSAGE COUNTY and OSAGE NATION v. OSAGE COUNTY BD. OF ADJUSTMENTSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2017
- Knesz v. Central Jersey Bank and Trust Co. of FreeholdSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
- House-Evans Co. v. Mattoon Transfer and Storage Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
- Londa Manufacturing Co. v. Saturn Rings, Inc.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1980
- Hale v. HallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.