Legal Opinion

Murphy v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)

Decided April 5, 2001No. 03-00-00193-CRPublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohn F. Onion, Justice

(Assigned).

Appellant Michael Francis Murphy appeals his conviction for operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated. See Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 49.04 (West Supp.2001). After the jury found appellant guilty, the trial court assessed punishment after proof of two alleged prior convictions for operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated. The penalty assessed was four years’ imprisonment. See id. § 49.09(b).

Points of Error

Appellant advances four points of error. In the first two points of error, appellant complains that the trial court, over objections, erred in defining the term “normal use” in…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Almanza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  2. Hutch v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
  3. Abdnor v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
  4. Harris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
  5. Arline v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Davy v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2001
  2. Price v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2001
  3. Cesar Gomez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2015
  4. Ford v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2003
  5. Hernandez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2003

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API