Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Bradley

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided October 14, 1961No. File 1929PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDevlin, J.

On May 1, 1952, the defendants purchased property located on Canon Street in the town of Norwalk, the deed for which contained the following covenant: “Said premises are subject to the agreement and restriction that the owners, their heirs and assigns, shall keep and maintain the dam and pond on said premises at the height required, for the benefit of the remaining premises of the Estate of Albert A. Betts or the assigns of said Estate, and the premises of other owners of adjoining property.” Previous transfers of the property contained the same covenant, and there was evidence the dam was…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Wolfmeyer v. Otis Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1953
  2. Straus v. KazemekasSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1924
  3. Neptune Park Assn. v. SteinbergSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
  4. Krupa v. Farmington River Power Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
  5. Anderson v. YaworskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Calabrese v. McHughDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2001
  2. Starr v. Commissioner of Environmental ProtectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API