Legal Opinion

Krupa v. Farmington River Power Co.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided December 30, 1959PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMurphy, J.

According to the allegations of the complaint, the plaintiffs’ tobacco farm in Windsor was extensively damaged during the disastrous floods of August, 1955, when a dike and flashboards which the defendant maintained in conjunction with a dam on the Farmington River gave way. The issues were closed, and the trial of the ease was started before the court (Comley, J.) without a jury on September 19, 1957. With the permission of the court, the plaintiffs on September 20 filed an amendment to their complaint which added three specifications of negligence. The defendant filed an answer to the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Cook v. LawlorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
  2. Longstean v. Owen McCaffrey's SonsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
  3. Smith v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1956
  4. Leahey v. HeasleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
  5. Beauton v. Connecticut Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1938

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Doublewal Corp. v. ToffolonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  2. Pet Car Products, Inc. v. BarnettSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1962
  3. Busko v. DeFilippoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
  4. L & R Realty v. Connecticut National BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  5. Morrone v. JoseSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1965

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API