In Re Levy
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.
Oral argument on behalf of the moving parties, in the above-entitled matters was heard on July 16, 1945, by the court sitting En Banc. Although there are factual differences in the two cases, since the major question presented is inherent in both, they will be decided in one opinion.
Both Major Levy and Staff Sergeant Warnock move for. immediate admission to practice at the bar of this state. Each of them concedes that he does not meet the requirements of Rule XXVI of the rules of this court concerning the admission of veterans, adopted by the court on February 13, 1945 [21 Wn. (2d) xvi]. Each…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Ex Parte GarlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- Ex Parte SecombeSupreme Court of the United States · 1857
- In re DayIllinois Supreme Court · 1899
- Brydonjack v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- In re the Proceedings for the Disbarment of BruenWashington Supreme Court · 1918
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Heiberger v. ClarkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
- Graffell v. HoneysuckleWashington Supreme Court · 1948
- In Re Chi-Dooh LiWashington Supreme Court · 1971
- Boeing Airplane Co. v. Employment Security DepartmentWashington Supreme Court · 1963
- Hagan & Van Camp, P.S. v. Kassler Escrow, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1981
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.