Taylor v. Richman
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Bell,
Plaintiff brought an action of assumpsit against defendant, one of his former partners, for his contribution to an alleged partnership debt, which plaintiff paid. The Court below sustained defendant’s, preliminary objections and dismissed the .complaint, without prejudice to plaintiff’s right to file a complaint in equity for this claim.
The question involved is not whether defendant has a just defense to the facts averred in plaintiff’s complaint, or whether plaintiff has a valid claim in equity, but whether the facts which plaintiff avers, assuming they are true,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Gardner v. Allegheny CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
- Rhodes v. TerheydenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
- Waldman v. ShoemakerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
- London v. KingsleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
- Narehood v. PearsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Isdaner v. BeyerDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1971
- Eisenberg v. Eisenberg, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1976
- Killbourne v. Denver & Ephrata T. & T. Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lancaster County1961
- Malitas v. Bonaventura, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Delaware County1964
- Sterback v. Plank, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lancaster County1964