Legal Opinion
Isdaner v. Beyer
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided August 5, 1971No. Civ. A. Nos. 71-28, 78-29PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
JOHN W. LORD, Jr., Chief Judge.
The above named plaintiffs have filed separate suits in which each seeks to recover damages for an alleged breach of their respective employment contracts. While both plaintiffs are domiciled in Pennsylvania, none of the defendants, who are all partners in the accounting firm of Touche, Ross & Co., are residents of Pennsylvania. Jurisdiction is based on 28 U.S.C.A. § 1332, diversity of citizenship and amount in controversy in excess of $10,000.00.
Defendants, who are all represented by the same counsel, have moved to dismiss the actions.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Provident Tradesmens Bank & Trust Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Brown v. MooreCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1957
- Provident Tradesmens Bank And Trust Company v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969
- Federal Resources Corporation v. The Shoni Uranium CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1969
- Gladys A. Bennie, Individually v. Kenneth Pastor and Marilyn Pastor, His WifeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1968
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Prescription Plan Service Corp. v. Albert Franco, Individually and as AdministratorCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- Royal Truck & Trailer, Inc. v. Armadora Maritima Salvadorena, S.A.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1981
- Cunard Line Ltd. v. AbneyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1982
- Whyham v. Piper Aircraft Corp.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1982
- Park v. DiddenCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.