Legal Opinion

Narehood v. Pearson

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 25, 1953No. Appeal, 197PublishedCited by 84 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Bell,

Many taxpayers were naturally surprised and incensed because the total assessments of real property in Clearfield County for 1953 were increased 400% over 1952.

Narehood and a large number of other taxpayers of Clearfield County filed a bill in equity to enjoin the county commissioners and the county board of assessment and revision of taxes “from proceeding on the assessments” which they averred were illegally and unconstitutionally made, or “levying any millage or collecting any taxes thereon.” The amended bill of complaint alleged that the imlues of properties…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Anderson National Bank v. LuckettSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Dohany v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  3. Wilson v. Philadelphia School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  4. Cumberland Coal Co. v. Board of Revision of Tax Assessments in Greene Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  5. Dougherty, Tr. v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by84 opinions

  1. Gardner v. Allegheny CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  2. Clifton v. Allegheny CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  3. Bogash v. ElkinsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  4. Savitz v. WeinsteinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  5. McWilliams v. McCabeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962

79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API