Legal Opinion

Ridley (ID 117475) v. State of Kansas

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided October 27, 2021No. 5:21-cv-03158Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS ANTHONY EARL RIDLEY, Petitioner, v. CASE NO. 21-3158-SAC STATE OF KANSAS, et al., Respondents. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter, which was dismissed on October 7, 2021, comes before the Court on Petitioner’s “motion for judgment as a matter of law and evidence” under Rule 50(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Doc. 24.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court will deny the motion. In July 2021, Petitioner filed a pro se petition for writ of mandamus naming only state officials as respondents. The Court cannot grant the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Knox v. BlandCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
  2. Jackson v. StandifirdCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
  3. Adkins v. Kansas Commission on Judicial QualificationsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API