Legal Opinion

Adkins v. Kansas Commission on Judicial Qualifications

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided February 8, 2013No. 11-3353, 12-3111, 12-3112, 12-3262, 12-3334UnpublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

PAUL KELLY, JR., Circuit Judge.

Four of the five appeals now before us were filed by Ebrahim (formerly Abraham) Adkins. The other appeal was filed by a defendant that was served with a petition for writ of mandamus, the Kansas Commission on Judicial Qualifications. We have jurisdiction over all of these appeals under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, but, as explained below, there is no merit to any of them. And, today, we impose filing restrictions against Mr. Adkins.

Mr. Adkins has a lengthy and abusive filing history. It is sufficient to summarize his court proceedings beginning with his…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Coppedge v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Hall v. BellmonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
  4. Anant Kumar Tripati v. William C. BeamanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
  5. Buchheit v. GreenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bowens v. CrowDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2022
  2. Marker v. OliverDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2024
  3. Marker v. OliverDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2024
  4. Ridley (ID 117475) v. State of KansasDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API