Legal Opinion
Knox v. Bland
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided February 14, 2011No. 10-7066PublishedCited by 122 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HARTZ, Circuit Judge.
Antone L. Knox, an inmate at the Oklahoma State Penitentiary in McAlester, Oklahoma, brings this pro se civil-rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against eight Oklahoma state judges. * His claims arise out of his unsuccessful attempts in state court to have his name changed for religious reasons to Ali Ishmael Mandingo Warrior Chief. He seeks mandamus and injunctive relief, contending that Defendants violated his Fourteenth Amendment rights to equal protection and due process, his First Amendment rights to freedom of religion and to petition the government for redress of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Johnson v. De GrandySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Pulliam v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Van Sickle v. HollowayCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by122 opinions
- Morkel v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
- Peterson v. TimmeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
- Driskell v. ThompsonDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2013
- Aragón v. De Baca County Sheriff's DepartmentDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2015
- Leatherwood v. WhetselCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
117 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.