Legal Opinion

Fox v. City of Holdingford

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided October 8, 1985No. C3-85-450PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WOZNIAK, Judge.

This is a no-fault insurance and Civil Damages Act case. Appellant City of Holdingford, defendant in the dram shop action, appeals from the order of the trial court denying its motion for a new trial, judgment NOV, and amended findings of fact, conclusions of law and order for judgment, and from the judgment of the trial court.

The trial court denied Holdingford’s motion to have basic economic loss benefits deducted from the verdict and held that Allstate Insurance Company is entitled to joint and several liability on its subrogation claim. We affirm.

FACTS

This case arises…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Milbrandt v. American Legion Post of MoraSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  2. Newmaster v. MahmoodCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  3. Erickson v. Hinckley Municipal Liquor StoreCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  4. Miller v. Astleford Equipment Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  5. Flanery v. Total Tree, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Mueller v. TheisCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
  2. Hedlund v. Citizens Security Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  3. Peters v. B.P. & E., Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  4. Ketterling v. Spud Bar, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  5. Preferred Risk Mutual Insurance Co. v. PagelCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API