Legal Opinion
Ketterling v. Spud Bar, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided December 30, 1986No. C7-86-722PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SEDGWICK, Judge.
The Spud Bar appeals from a judgment in favor of Tracy Ketterling for $209,-276.90 pursuant to liability under Minn. Stat. § 340.95 (1984) (Civil Damage Act), and from an order denying a new trial. Appellant alleges set-off should be allowed on the verdict amount in order to prevent a double recovery to Ketterling since basic economic loss and uninsured motorist benefits have been previously paid by the insurance carrier. Appellant also claims joint and several liability should not be applied to force them to pay 100% of a judgment when their fault was judged to be 47%.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hosley v. Armstrong Cork Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Newmaster v. MahmoodCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- Maday v. Yellow Taxi Co. of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Erickson v. Hinckley Municipal Liquor StoreCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- Fox v. City of HoldingfordCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
3Cited by4 opinions
- Casper v. City of StacyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
- Rogers v. Ponti-Peterson Post 1720 Veterans of Foreign Wars of the United States of America, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
- Ketterling v. American States Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- Fette v. PetersonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987