Preferred Risk Mutual Insurance Co. v. Pagel
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SCHUMACHER, Judge.
Preferred Risk Mutual Insurance Company (Preferred Risk), a no-fault reparation obligor sued the alleged tortfeasors, respondents, claiming a right of subrogation for uninsured motorist benefits paid. Preferred Risk had paid uninsured motorist benefits to its insured, prior to the present action, that fully compensated her for her injuries. Respondents moved the trial court for summary judgment claiming that a no-fault carrier’s subrogation claim for uninsured motorist benefits which have been paid cannot be asserted against the tortfeasor. Respondents alleged that…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Betlach v. Wayzata CondominiumSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Fitzer v. BloomSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Milbrandt v. American Legion Post of MoraSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- MILBANK MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. KluverSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
- Gudvangen v. Austin Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Principal Financial Group v. Allstate Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
- American Family Mutual Insurance Co. v. VanmanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
- Principal Financial Group v. Allstate Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991