Legal Opinion
National Bank of Commerce v. Dow Chemical Co.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided January 11, 1999No. 98-1200PublishedCited by 85 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BEAM, Circuit Judge.
Representatives of Matthew Nolan Arnold, and his father Michael David Arnold (the Arnolds), appeal an adverse grant of summary judgment on their claims against several chemical companies. The district court 1 granted summary judgment in favor of Dow Chemical Co., Rofan Services, Inc. and Epco, Inc. because the evidence showed that their product had not been used in the Arnolds’ home. The district court granted summary judgment to the remaining chemical companies, United Industries Corp., Ciba Geigy Corp., Chevron Chemical Co., and Bengal Chemical Co. because it found that…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by85 opinions
- National Bank Of Commerce v. Dow Chemical Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
- Sears, Roebuck and Co. v. Bonnie Patricia O'brien, Sears, Roebuck and Co. v. Lois M. SiverlyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
- Bambu v. EI Dupont De Nemours & Co., Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
- In Re StarLink Corn Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2002
- Dow Chemical Co. v. EblingIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000
80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.