Legal Opinion

Spencer v. Black

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1925No. Docket No. 56PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClark, J.

Defendants, husband and wife, owned a house and lot as tenants by the entireties. Plaintiff, claiming to have furnished labor and materials for improving and repairing the dwelling and funds used to pay taxes, and to pay interest and principal of a mortgage covering the property, sued to recover. The declaration has an assumpsit count. Judgment in usual assumpsit form was entered against both defendants. Defendant Eva A. Black seeks review on error, without bill of exceptions, under Supreme Court Rule No. 11. Appellant raises two questions. The ■first, quoting:

“The sole question of law…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gill v. DeArmantMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Miller v. WalkerMichigan Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Kingsnorth v. BakerMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Menery v. BackusMichigan Supreme Court · 1895

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Napier v. JacobsMichigan Supreme Court · 1987
  2. New York Life Ins. Co. v. CalhounCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940
  3. Kline v. KlineMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API