Legal Opinion

Menery v. Backus

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 10, 1895PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error to Alcona; Simpson, J. Proceedings under tlie log-lien law by George Menery against Absalom Backus, Jr. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMcGeath, C. J.

Morrill Bros, were operating a sawmill, lumber camp, and farm. The farm, timber land, and products belonged to defendant. Plaintiff was engaged in and about the mill, in the lumber camp, and upon the farm, and claimed a lien on the products of the mill for the work done in camp and about the mill. His time had been kept, but was not apportioned; and the objection raised is that he was not able to state the whole time that he was employed upon the products sought to be charged. A recitation of the testimony would serve no good purpose. Plaintiff was compelled to estimate the-*330proportion of time…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Spencer v. BlackMichigan Supreme Court · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API