Gill v. DeArmant
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Emmet. (Aldrich, J., presiding.) Replevin. Defendants bring error. Th& facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.
This is an action of replevin for one saw frame and carriage and appurtenances.
The action was commenced in justice’s.court in Emmet county. The writ was placed in the hands of the sheriff, who returned upon the writ that he had replevied the property, and delivered the same to the plaintiff, and also summoned the defendants to appear according to the mandate of the writ. The parties appeared on the return-day and joined issue; the defendants giving notice, under their plea of the general issue, that the property described was at the time the suit was brought a part and portion of certain…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Voorhees v. . McGinnisNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
- Manwaring v. JenisonMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
3Cited by7 opinions
- Kline v. KlineMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979
- Pettyplace v. Groton Bridge & Manufacturing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1894
- Lansing Iron & Engine Works v. WilburMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
- Charles Lippincott & Co. v. RichUtah Supreme Court · 1899
- Gregorian Building Co. v. GalvinMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.