Legal Opinion

Morrison v. Morrison

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided May 25, 1937PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pending the wife's contested suit for separate maintenance and immediately prior to the day fixed for the final hearing of the cause a reconciliation was effected, partly through the efforts of the wife's solicitor. He now applies for the allowance of costs and counsel fee against the defendant husband and (incidentally) for an order dismissing the bill.

The motion to dismiss is not opposed, and will be granted. The cause of action having ceased to exist because of the reconciliation, the suit has been terminated. Byrne v. Byrne,93 N.J. Eq. 5; Wilson v. Wilson, 14 N.J. Mis. R. 33, 47.

The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kuntz v. KuntzNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1912
  2. Byrne v. ByrneNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1921

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lane v. RushmoreNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1938
  2. Iovino v. IovinoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959
  3. Cole v. ColeNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954
  4. Cole v. ColeNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API