Legal Opinion
Lane v. Rushmore
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided May 5, 1938PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The complainant in these proceedings was the solicitor for Hazel Rushmore, the wife of the defendant Samuel W. Rushmore, in certain matrimonial proceedings brought by her against her husband. This bill of complaint is brought by the complainant to enjoin Samuel W. Rushmore and Sigmund C. Bernstein, his attorney, from proceeding with a pending action at law in the supreme court, Union county, wherein Rushmore as plaintiff charges the complainant, Merritt Lane, and Hazel Rushmore, with a conspiracy between them, and with instituting and prosecuting in bad faith and with dishonest purpose and by…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Beloit v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- In re Walsh's EstateSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1909
- Mayor of Paterson v. BakerNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1893
- Burns v. RosensteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Bridgeport Hydraulic Co. v. PearsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
- Solimine v. HollanderNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1940
- Reconstruction Finance Corp. v. First National BankDistrict Court, D. Wyoming · 1955
- Eadon v. ReulerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1961
- East Newark Realty Corp. v. DolanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.