Legal Opinion

Cole v. Cole

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided April 5, 1954PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

30 N.J. Super. 276 (1954)

104 A.2d 76

MARGUERITE B. COLE, PLAINTIFF,

v.

NATHANIEL B. COLE, DEFENDANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division.

Decided April 5, 1954.

Mr. J. Schuyler Huff, attorney for plaintiff.

Messrs. Ruback, Albach & Weisman, attorneys for defendant.

McLEAN, J.S.C.

This application is for an order requiring defendant husband to pay to plaintiff wife's attorney a proper and reasonable amount as and for counsel fees for legal services performed by said attorney in prosecuting plaintiff's separate maintenance action and defending plaintiff on the counterclaim for divorce…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Armour v. ArmourSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1946
  2. Shaffer v. ShafferSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1941
  3. Gross v. GrossNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
  4. Hopson v. HopsonNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1924
  5. Morrison v. MorrisonNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1937

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cole v. ColeNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954
  2. Cohen v. CohenNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API