Legal Opinion

Kuntz v. Kuntz

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided June 18, 1912PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Howell, V. C.

This is a suit between husband and wife; she files her bill for maintenance under the statute. Before the suit had proceeded to hearing a reconciliation was effected between the parties by *430the efforts of counsel, ancl, as was stated by counsel at the argument, all offences were condoned and cohabitation between them was resumed. Counsel for the complainant now moves for a counsel fee, to be paid by-the husband. The motion is undefended, and the question is whether, under the circumstances, it •can be allowed. It was claimed on the- part of the complainant’s counsel to he payable…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Shelton v. PendletonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1847

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Bell v. BellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
  2. Friedman v. FriedmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  3. McNutt v. BeatySupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
  4. Grimstad v. JohnsonMontana Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Jones v. JonesTexas Supreme Court · 1936

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API