Kuntz v. Kuntz
New Jersey Court of Chancery
1Opinion of the Court
Howell, V. C.
This is a suit between husband and wife; she files her bill for maintenance under the statute. Before the suit had proceeded to hearing a reconciliation was effected between the parties by *430the efforts of counsel, ancl, as was stated by counsel at the argument, all offences were condoned and cohabitation between them was resumed. Counsel for the complainant now moves for a counsel fee, to be paid by-the husband. The motion is undefended, and the question is whether, under the circumstances, it •can be allowed. It was claimed on the- part of the complainant’s counsel to he payable…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Shelton v. PendletonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1847
3Cited by16 opinions
- Bell v. BellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
- Friedman v. FriedmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- McNutt v. BeatySupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
- Grimstad v. JohnsonMontana Supreme Court · 1921
- Jones v. JonesTexas Supreme Court · 1936
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.