Legal Opinion

Booth v. Stow

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 11, 1918No. Civ. No. 2442PublishedCited by 7 opinions

The .facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

STURTEVANT, J., pro tem.

is an action to quiet title. The defendants had judgment in the trial court and the plaintiffs have appealed. The appellants have brought up the judgment-roll and a bill of exceptions. From the record before us, it appears that the dispute arose over the location of a boundary line; the plaintiffs filed a complaint in the ordinary form of an action to quiet title; the defendants appeared separately and filed separate answers and at the same time filed cross-complaints; the plaintiffs answered the cross-complaints, and, among other defenses, they pleaded the statute of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Young v. BlakemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Miller v. LucoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Wilson v. MadisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Silva v. AzevedoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Phillips v. HagartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Campbell v. WeisbrodIdaho Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Warden v. StollCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Wagner v. WorrellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  4. Furnivall v. GrovesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  5. Baucum v. LeBaronCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API