Legal Opinion

Baucum v. LeBaron

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 28, 1955No. Civ. No. 8510PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeek, J.

Plaintiffs sought to quiet their title to certain land in Tehama County, alleging that defendants claimed certain easements thereon. Defendants’ cross-complaint admitted their claim and set forth two causes for affirmative relief. The first sought reformation of the deed by which *594they claimed title to the easements in question, and the second prayed that their title to the easements be quieted. The judgment of the court quieted plaintiffs’ title and further adjudged that defendants were the owners of the easements in question. Plaintiffs now appeal from the latter portion of that judgment.

The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hendershott v. ShipmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Booth v. StowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
  3. Drake v. TuckerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  4. Noyes v. HuffmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Nevin v. SalkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  2. Pocahontas Land Corp. v. EvansWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Turino v. CapraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API