Legal Opinion

State v. Stokes

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 23, 1976No. Civ. 9199PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PEDERSON, Justice.

Arthur W. Stokes was counsel for Gordon James Johnson, who was convicted of driving while under the influence of intoxicating liquor in municipal court in Jamestown. An appeal was taken to the district court and, thereafter, by stipulation of counsel and order of the district judge, the appeal was shifted to the Stutsman County Court With Increased Jurisdiction. The matter was set for trial de novo to a county court jury for 9 a. m. on July 28, 1975. At 8:30 or 8:45 a. m. on the 28th of July, Stokes informed the Assistant City Attorney, Georgia Pope, by telephone from his…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Gompers v. Bucks Stove & Range Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. Shillitani v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Bloom v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. United States v. Ralph W. RossCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1976
  5. State v. StokesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Dvorak v. DvorakNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  2. State v. CurtisNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  3. State v. CurtisNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  4. State v. GoellerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
  5. State v. KopperudNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API