Legal Opinion

United States v. Ralph W. Ross

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided May 11, 1976No. 75-1615PublishedCited by 71 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCREE, Circuit Judge.

This appeal requires us to determine whether a district court may require an attorney who fails to appear at a scheduled trial date to pay, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1927, 1 the costs of summoning a jury venire of 42 persons. The statute permits a district court to require an attorney to personally satisfy costs when he “so multiplies the proceedings in any ease as to increase costs unreasonably and vexatiously.” We determine (1) that the attorney’s conduct did not “unreasonably and vexatiously” increase costs, and (2) that the expense of the jury is not a “cost” within…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Ex Parte PetersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  2. Henkel v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Ry. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. Donna M. Kiefel v. Las Vegas Hacienda, Inc., a California Corporation, Reese Hubbard, Donna M. Kiefel v. Las Vegas Hacienda, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1969
  4. Gleckman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1935
  5. People v. KennedyMichigan Supreme Court · 1885

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by71 opinions

  1. Roadway Express, Inc. v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Stephen Michael Ridder v. City of Springfield, Clark CountyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
  3. Braley v. CampbellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
  4. Eash v. Riggins Trucking Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
  5. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. ConnerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API