Estate of Wainola v. Ristolainen
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
WINDES, Justice.
Matti Wainola,- a resident of Yuma, Arizona, departed this life on September 23, 1951, and W. D. Riley was appointed administrator of his estate. One Eero Tattari, representing himself to be one of the decedent’s heirs, filed a petition alleging that various persons claimed to be heirs and praying that the court ascertain and declare the rights of all persons claiming an interest in the estate. After the usual orders and notice required in such proceedings, Anna Ristolainen, Uuno Tattari and the said Eero Tattari, appellees herein, filed a complaint alleging decedent left…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Holmes v. ConnableSupreme Court of Iowa · 1900
- Otero v. Soto Ex Rel. GonzalesArizona Supreme Court · 1928
- Martin v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1953
- Davis v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1935
- Lentz v. LandersArizona Supreme Court · 1919
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Premier Financial Services. v. CitibankCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
- Gaveck v. Arizona State Board of Podiatry ExaminersCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
- Thom v. BaileyOregon Supreme Court · 1971
- Graham v. Vegetable Oil Products CompanyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
- Muchmore v. Industrial Commission of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1957
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.