Legal Opinion

Lentz v. Landers

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided December 23, 1919No. Civil No. 1674PublishedCited by 14 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the County of Maricopa. F. H. Lyman, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtBaker, J.

This was an action to recover upon a promissory note for $3,500, given hy the defendant, L. D. Landers, to one A. H. Weber, and by Weber indorsed to the plaintiff, William G. Lentz. The de*120fendant admitted the execution of the note and nonpayment, but alleged that the note was without consideration, and that it was fraudulently obtained,, and charged that the plaintiff had notice of these defenses before purchasing the note. A verdict was returned by the jury in favor of the defendant, and judgment was thereupon entered. Plaintiff moved for a new trial, and appealed from the judgment and order…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Sonnentheil v. Christian Moerlein Brewing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1899
  2. Spreckels v. GorrillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Arnd v. AylesworthSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
  4. David v. ParkMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
  5. Hicks v. StevensIllinois Supreme Court · 1887

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Silva v. TraverArizona Supreme Court · 1945
  2. In Re Gary's EstateArizona Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Davis v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Little v. BrownArizona Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Davis v. First National BankArizona Supreme Court · 1924

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API