Legal Opinion

Martin v. Industrial Commission

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided May 18, 1953No. 5696PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

UDALL, Justice.

Callie Hoovler Martin, a widow, and Andrew Roy Martin, her infant child, as petitioners, have brought before us for review an award of the Industrial Commission of Arizona — hereinafter termed the commission- — denying dependents’ claim for “death benefits” arising out of the death of the husband, Andrew Martin. The latter at the time was an employee of Swift & Company, who carried workmen’s compensation coverage with the State Industrial Fund.

After the original award denying compensation was entered, a rehearing was granted where the facts were more fully developed, whereupon…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. NewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  2. Davis v. JudsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Jerke v. Delmont State BankSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Ison v. Western Vegetable DistributorsArizona Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Goodyear Aircraft Corporation v. GilbertArizona Supreme Court · 1947

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Circle K Store 1131 v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Graham v. Vegetable Oil Products CompanyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
  3. Muchmore v. Industrial Commission of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Powell v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Helton v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1959

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API