Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Tucker

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided February 4, 1942No. A-9916PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBaeepoot, P. J.

Petitioner has filed in this court his petition for writ of habeas corpus alleging that he is unlawfully imprisoned and restrained of his liberty in the county jail of Oklahoma county by George Goff, sheriff of said county. He alleges that such imprisonment is by reason of the following facts:

“That according to the best of the knowledge and! belief of your petitioner, he was taken into custody and is now being held in said jail by said sheriff, George Goff, under and by virtue of a purported commitment issued by the court clerk of Oklahoma county, State of Oklahoma, and placed in the hands of…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Neal v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  2. People ex rel. Boenert v. BarrettIllinois Supreme Court · 1903
  3. People ex rel. Smith v. AllenIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Ex Parte EldridgeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1910
  5. United States v. WilsonU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Idaho · 1891

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ex Parte HillCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1948
  2. Bonner v. BrockCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1980
  3. Ex Parte HillCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1948
  4. Ex Parte StaggsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API