Ex Parte Hill
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
1ConcurrenceBarefoot, P. J.
I concur in the conclusion reached in the majority opinion, by reason of the facts presented in this case, but cannot agree to the statement: “The only way of satisfying a judgment judicially is by fulfilling its requirements.”
If it is intended by this statement to hold that no act of the court can be had or done which causes the release of one charged Avith a crime without serving the sentence imposed, I cannot agree that this is the law.
There are many instances where by unreasonable delay on the part of courts by their acts and conduct it would be improper to force a defendant to actually…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Boykin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1948
- Ex Parte TuckerCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1942