Legal Opinion

People v. Eroshevich

California Supreme Court

Decided November 3, 2014No. S210545PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CANTIL-SAKAUYE, C. J.

After a jury trial that resulted in defendant Howard K. Stem’s convictions on two counts of conspiracy, the trial court granted Stern’s motion for a new trial and dismissed the charges on the grounds that the evidence was insufficient to establish that he intended to commit a crime. The Court of Appeal reversed, reinstating the jury’s verdict, and ordered that the trial court could consider Stern’s remaining grounds for a new trial, but that double jeopardy precluded him from being retried. We granted review on the sole issue of whether the state and federal…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Tibbs v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Arizona v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Oregon v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1982

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. In re MartinezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
  2. People v. PedrozaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  3. People v. Pineda, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  4. People v. ValenciaAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 2015
  5. Conservatorship of Christopher B.California Court of Appeal · 2015

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API