People v. Eroshevich
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CANTIL-SAKAUYE, C. J.
After a jury trial that resulted in defendant Howard K. Stem’s convictions on two counts of conspiracy, the trial court granted Stern’s motion for a new trial and dismissed the charges on the grounds that the evidence was insufficient to establish that he intended to commit a crime. The Court of Appeal reversed, reinstating the jury’s verdict, and ordered that the trial court could consider Stern’s remaining grounds for a new trial, but that double jeopardy precluded him from being retried. We granted review on the sole issue of whether the state and federal…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Tibbs v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Arizona v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Oregon v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- In re MartinezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
- People v. PedrozaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- People v. Pineda, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- People v. ValenciaAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 2015
- Conservatorship of Christopher B.California Court of Appeal · 2015
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.