Legal Opinion

United States ex rel. Chestatee Pyrites & Chemical Corp. v. Wilbur

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided December 12, 1932No. 5760PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

YAN ORSDEL, Associate Justice.

This ease was brought in the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia under the Act of February 13,1929 (45 Stat. 1166), to obtain a review of certain questions of law decided by the Secretary of the Interior and involved in petitioner’s original claim for losses sustained in producing or preparing to produce war minerals.

On March 5, 1919, relator company filed with the Secretary of the Interior a claim for losses occasioned through expenditures it had made for the production of pyrites under the conditions specified in section 5 of the Aet of March 2, 1919 (40…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wilbur v. U. S. Ex Rel. Vindicator Consolidated Gold Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Work v. United States Ex Rel. Chestatee Pyrites & Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. Work v. United States ex rel. Chestatee Pyrites & Chemical Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1924
  4. United States ex rel. Chestatee Pyrites & Chemical Corp. v. WilburCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1931

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ickes v. United States Ex Rel. Chestatee Pyrites & Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API