Legal Opinion

United States v. Whitley

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided May 2, 1984No. Nos. 83-5428, 83-5438, 83-5439, 83-5440 and 83-5456PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KEITH, Circuit Judge.

The appellants, James A. Whitley, Joseph L. Hucks, James P. Wagers, Matthew Foley and Douglas Harrison, were indicted by a grand jury on December 14, 1982 on two counts. Count I charged that the appellants knowingly and wilfully agreed, confederated and conspired with one another, and others unknown to the Grand Jury, to commit offenses against the United States in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1),1 and knowingly and intentionally distributed, and possessed with intent to distribute cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 8462. *1132Count II charged that appellants, aided and…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. Opper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Mathews v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. United States v. J.D. Ashworth, A/K/A James Daniel Ashworth (86-6235) and Scott Ashworth, A/K/A Samuel Scott Ashworth (86-6236)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
  3. United States v. Harold Donald HenryCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
  4. United States v. Jorge Mendez-OrtizCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
  5. United States v. PaulinoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API