Legal Opinion

United States v. Harold Donald Henry

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided December 12, 1984No. 83-1366PublishedCited by 102 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TATE, Circuit Judge:

We granted en banc rehearing, 727 F.2d 1373 (5th Cir.1984), to resolve a conflict in circuit precedent as to when a defendant in a criminal trial is entitled to have the jury instructed on his defense of entrapment.

Our precedential rule is uniform that a defendant may not invoke the entrapment defense by requesting that the issue be submitted to the jury while he denies committing the act charged in the indictment. United States v. Garrett, 716 F.2d 257, 270 (5th Cir.1983); United States v. Rey, 706 F.2d 145, 147 (5th Cir.1983). On the other hand, as will be described more…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. United States v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Sorrells v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. Sherman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. Hampton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Julian W. Sears v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by102 opinions

  1. Mathews v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Adventure Outdoors, Inc. v. Michael BloombergCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
  3. United States v. Perdomo, Juan John Doe A/K/A "Juan," Juan PerdomoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
  4. United States v. Kim Allen Stanley, John R. Spiczak, Evan N. Leake, Edward Lee Shorr, Russell Greenway, Stanley Dimich, and Clement James DemattoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
  5. United States v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008

97 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API