Legal Opinion · Dissent

Superx Drugs Corp. v. State Board of Pharmacy

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 1963No. Calendar 32, Docket 50,087PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1DissentBlack, J.

Executive as well as legislative attempts to interfere with, trespass' upon, or even coerce the judicial department are nothing new in the history of tripartite government. On account thereof the judiciary, sworn as it is to uphold and maintain the constitutionally requisite prerogatives of each department, has on historic occasion been compelled to meet head-on all such attempted invasions-and, doubtless, will be so compelled as long as three-divisional government endures. - This case, regrettably, confronts us with just such an occasion.

During President Jefferson’s administration congress…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. National Labor Relations Board v. Hearst Publications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Muskrat v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  3. Unemployment Compensation Comm'n of Alaska v. AragonSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. Louis K. Liggett Co. v. BaldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  5. Goldsmith v. United States Board of Tax AppealsSupreme Court of the United States · 1926

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. City of Berkley v. HolmesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971
  2. Superx Drugs Corp. v. State Board of PharmacyMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Eberts Cadillac Co. v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Superx Drugs Corp. v. State Board of PharmacyMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Beebee v. Haslett Public SchoolsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1972

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API