Legal Opinion

Superx Drugs Corp. v. State Board of Pharmacy

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 10, 1965No. Calendar 32, Docket 50,087PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

On Rehearing.

O’Hara, J.

The requisite factual background for understanding the issue on rehearing granted by this Court sua sponte may be had in all but 2 particulars by reference to the opinions in Superx Drugs Corporation v. State Board of Pharmacy, 372 Mich 22.

The necessary additions are: First, on February 3, 1964, rehearing on application made by defendant board was denied by an equally divided Court. This left the result reached by former Chief Justice Carr in full force and effect. That result taken from the Carr opinion was, at p 60:

“The writ [of mandamus] will accordingly issue…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Toan v. McGinnMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Superx Drugs Corp. v. State Board of PharmacyMichigan Supreme Court · 1963

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Campbell v. Judges' Retirement BoardMichigan Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Saginaw Valley Trotting Ass'n v. Michigan Racing CommissionerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. Superx Drugs Corp. v. State Board of PharmacyMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance Exchange v. Commissioner of InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Beebee v. Haslett Public SchoolsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1972

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API