Legal Opinion · Dissent
Superx Drugs Corp. v. State Board of Pharmacy
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided May 10, 1965No. Calendar 32, Docket 50,087; Calendar 6, Docket 51,379PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1DissentDethmers, J.
This was original mandamus to compel defendant to grant a license to plaintiff■ for operation of a drugstore for the year commencing July 1, 1962. The case now makes its third full dress appearance here. On December 5, 1963, by opinion of a majority of this Court, it was ordered that the writ issue. Superx Drugs Corporation v. State Board of Pharmacy, 372 Mich 22, 44. After rehearing denied and later granted, this Court remanded the matter to defendant board for hearing *443and determination, with jurisdiction retained here for further appellate review if desired by either party. Superx Drugs…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- England v. Louisiana State Board of Medical ExaminersSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Ferguson v. SkrupaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Local Union No. 189, Amalgamated Meat Cutters & Butcher Workmen v. Jewel Tea Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Head v. New Mexico Board of Examiners in OptometrySupreme Court of the United States · 1963
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Schweitzer v. Board of Forensic Polygraph ExaminersMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977
- Cameron v. Auto Club Ins. Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 2006
- Cameron v. Auto Club Ins. Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 2006
- Northville Coach Line, Inc. v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1967
- Northville Coach Line, Inc. v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1967
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.