Legal Opinion

Frank Earl Senk v. Charles H. Zimmerman, Superintendent and Leroy Zimmerman, Attorney General of the State of Pennsylvania

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided October 26, 1989No. 88-5794PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

SCIRICA, Circuit Judge.

Frank Earl Senk appeals the denial of his petition for writ of habeas corpus. The petition alleges that Senk was denied his sixth amendment right to effective assistance of counsel by virtue of his lawyer’s failure to pursue, in post-trial motions and on appeal, a challenge to the trial court’s charge on first degree murder, which Senk alleges contained an impermissible mandatory presumption on the element of intent. The district court held that because the judicial decisions that arguably render unconstitutional the jury instruction on intent were…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. GribbleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  2. Commonwealth v. JonesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  3. State v. HuttonOhio Supreme Court · 2003
  4. United States v. TaymanDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1995
  5. Holloway v. HornDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2001

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API