Hall v. Soule
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Calhoun Circuit. The facts sufficiently appear by the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Campbell J.:
This was an action brought against defendant to recover from, him, as guarantor or surety, the sum of §500, for which it was alleged he became responsible for his son, Harrison Soule. The goods were sold in 1858, and in January, 1859, Harrison Soule, to whom they were sold and charged, gave his notes for the amount due, which remain unpaid. It appeared from the parol evidence that ¡previous to the sale defendant had agreed, if plaintiff’s firm would give Harrison Soule a credit to the amount of §500, that he would be responsible for its payment. The only written instrument offered…
2Cited by26 opinions
- Gault v. StormontMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
- Barton v. GrayMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
- In re Williams' EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
- Paul v. GrahamMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
- Day v. WilsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.