Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. Hines

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 5, 1924No. 12893PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCochran, J.

This action was filed by the plaintiff m error against the M., K. & T. Railway Company, a corporation, and Walker D. Hines, Director General of Railroads of the United States of America, to recover damages for the destruction by fire of certain fence posts belonging to the plaintiff in error. The action was dismissed as to Walker D. Hines, Director General, and proceeded to trial against the M. K. & T. Railway Company. The parties will hereinafter be referred, to as jdaintiff and defendant, as they appeared in the trial court. Upon the trial of the case, it developed that the act of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Consolidated Steel & Wire Co. v. Burnham, Hanna, Munger & Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1899
  2. Piper v. Choctaw Northern Townsite & Improvement Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1906
  3. Lewis v. BandySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  4. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. McCulleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  5. Lusk, Receivers v. HensonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Pierce v. C. I. T. Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  2. Walters v. Tulsa Rig, Reel & Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  3. Crabtree v. Standard Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  4. Luke v. PattersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
  5. Clark v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1984

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API