Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. McCulley
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Hughes County; John Caruthers, Judge. Action by Bert McCulley against the Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Company. Prom a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
ROBERTSON, C.
On November 21, 1908, defendant in error (hereinafter designated as plaintiff) filed his petition in the district court of Hughes county against the Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Company, and sought thereby to recover the sum of $1,999.90, as damages for personal injuries, alleging, in. substance, that he was a drayman of several years’ experience, engaged in the business of unloading and transferring freight from defendant’s cars to consignees in the city of Holdenville, and that on said day defendant placed on its tracks at Holdenvill'e a car loaded with…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Evansville & Terre Haute Railroad v. GriffinIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Indiana, Bloomington & Western Railway Co. v. BarnhartIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
- Brady v. Chicago & G. W. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1902
- Davis v. Central Congregational Society of Jamaica PlainMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1880
- Solts v. Southwestern Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Jones v. Citizens' State BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Frisco Lumber Co. v. ThomasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Mitchell v. HinesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. First Bank of FallisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Reynolds v. BrooksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.