Legal Opinion

Piper v. Choctaw Northern Townsite & Improvement Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 14, 1906PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Error from the District Court of Blaine County; before J. L. Bancoast, Trial Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the court by

Gillette, J.:

This action is brought to enforce performance and pajanent of the following contract:

“contract.
“As a matter of inducement for the purpose of securing a railroad and aiding in the construction of the same, said railroad to be constructed from at or near Geary, Blaine county, Oklahoma Territory, to the town of Watonga, Blaine county, Oklahoma, I do hereby promise to pay to the Waton-ga and Northwestern Eailroad Company, its successors or assigns, the sum of two hundred and fifty dollars, as follows, to-wit: One hundred and twenty-five dollars to be paid on or…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McClure v. Mo. River, Fort Scott & Gulf RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1872
  2. First National Bank v. HendrieSupreme Court of Iowa · 1878
  3. Rolke v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1860

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Guthrie & Western Railroad v. RhodesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
  2. Alcorn v. DennisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  3. Cooper v. Ft. Smith & W. R. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  4. Cobb v. Wm. Kenefick Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  5. Rosecrans v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1943

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API