City of Knoxville v. Lively
Tennessee Supreme Court
FROM KNOX. Appeal from the Circuit-Court of Knox County to the Court of Civil Appeals, and by certiorari to the Court of Civil Appeals from the Supreme Court.— HoN. VoN A. Hueeakeb, Judge.
1Opinion of the Court
Me. Cox, Special Justice,
delivered the opinion of the Court.
This is an action for damages for personal injuries. At the time of the injury, Lively was working as conductor on one of the street cars of the Knoxville Kail-way & Light Company, in the city of Knoxville. Two cars were connected, the rear one being designated and known as a trailer. The motorman was on the front car, and Lively was the conductor on the rear car, or trailer; the latter being an open, summer car, with running boards on each side. There was a picnic at Fountain City on the date of the injury in question, toward which…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Conelly v. NashvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1897
- Chattanooga v. DowlingTennessee Supreme Court · 1898
- City of Nashville v. MasonTennessee Supreme Court · 1916
- Irvine v. ChattanoogaTennessee Supreme Court · 1898
- Mayor of Knoxville v. KlasingTennessee Supreme Court · 1903
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Vaughn v. City of AlcoaTennessee Supreme Court · 1952
- Lehmkuhl v. City of Junction CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1956
- Metropolitan Government of Nashville v. CountsTennessee Supreme Court · 1976
- Yarbrough v. L. N.R.R. Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1930
- Tellico Bank & Trust Co. v. LoomisTennessee Supreme Court · 1922
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.