Legal Opinion

Irvine v. Chattanooga

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided October 3, 1898PublishedCited by 25 opinions

FROM HAMILTON. Appeal in error from Circuit Court of Hamilton County. Floyd Estill, J.

1Opinion of the CourtMcAlister, J.

The object of this suit is to hold the city of Chattanooga liable for the loss of a dwelling house by fire, which is alleged to have occurred in consequence of the negligence and inefficiency of the fire department. The fire occurred about ten o’clock on the morning of June 26, 1896, *292and the dwelling was totally destroyed. It originated in the roof near the chimney, and, as soon .as it was discovered, the plaintiff turned in an electrical alarm to fire hall No. 2, situated about two blocks distant. The fire department having failed to respond, a general alarm was given, to all the fire halls…

2Cited by25 opinions

  1. Ezell v. CockrellTennessee Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Williams v. Town of MorristownCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1949
  3. Smiddy v. City of MemphisTennessee Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Mayor of Nashville v. BurnsTennessee Supreme Court · 1915
  5. City of Nashville v. MasonTennessee Supreme Court · 1916

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API