Legal Opinion

In Re Connolly

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 6, 1936No. Crim. 1920PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNourse, P. J.

The petitioner seeks his release from custody under an indictment charging the receiving of bribes, extortion and a violation of section 653f of the Penal Code. The respondent has demurred to the petition and has also filed a return thereto. The petitioner has traversed the return in the nature of both demurrer and answer. Stipulations were made at the oral argument covering minor differences in the various statements of facts and the cause was submitted upon all these pleadings as thus agreed to. Hence, when we refer to any allegation in the pleadings it is to be understood that the matter…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Hotaling v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  2. People v. McGeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Great Western Power Co. v. PillsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Schwarz v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  5. McClatchy v. Superior Court of SacramentoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. In Re BellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. In Re ConnorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Menefee v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
  4. Ex Parte DickersonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
  5. Wilde v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API