Legal Opinion

State v. Andrews

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided August 3, 1992No. 27154-7-I; 27220-9-I; 27612-3-IPublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAgid, J.

Each of the defendants in these three consolidated cases appeals his conviction on the ground that his right to a speedy trial under CrR 3.3 was violated because, although the case was called and the trial court heard and decided a preliminary motion prior to the expiration of the speedy trial period, the court was not able to proceed with the remainder of the trial before the speedy trial period had elapsed.

I

Facts

State v. Andrews

Robert C. Andrews was charged with three counts of first degree theft on August 9, 1989. He was arraigned on Sep tember 25, 1989. After several delays, one because…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. CampbellWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Roscoe v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Davis v. Globe MacHine Manufacturing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1984
  4. State v. MacKWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  5. State v. FladeboWashington Supreme Court · 1989

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. CarsonWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State v. CarsonWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State v. VermillionCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
  4. State v. VermillionCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
  5. State v. ShillingCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1995

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API