State v. Shilling
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtWebster, J.
James Shilling appeals two assault convictions. Shilling argues (1) he did not receive a speedy trial, (2) the glass with which he assaulted the victim was not a deadly weapon, (3) his offender score should not have included an attempted murder conviction, (4) his sentence should run concurrently with the attempted murder sentence, and (5) he was denied effective assistance of counsel. We affirm.
Facts
On August 1, 1991, James Shilling went to a Black Angus bar in Snohomish County. Shilling drank beer and hard liquor over the next 2 to 3 hours. Mark Honey, a Black Angus bouncer, observed…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- State v. CollicottWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. RaperCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1987
- State v. EarlyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1993
- State v. SorensonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1972
- State v. CarlsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1992
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- State v. WiningsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
- State v. WiningsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
- State v. BarraganCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
- State v. HayesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1996
- State v. BarraganCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.