Legal Opinion

State v. Vermillion

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided August 5, 2002No. 47309-3-IPublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKennedy, J.

Marvin Lee Vermillion was convicted of first-degree robbery and threats to bomb property. Beginning six days before jury selection, Mr. Vermillion repeatedly and unequivocally requested to represent himself. The trial court denied his requests on the improper basis that his appointed counsel was better educated and versed in the law and thus would better serve his interests. However, assertion of the right to self-representation does not require a showing of technical knowledge. If a person is competent to stand trial, he is competent to represent himself. Mr. Vermillion did not request that…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  4. Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  5. McKaskle v. WigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. State v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
  2. State v. MadsenWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  3. State v. MadsenWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  4. State v. VermillionCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
  5. Lovin v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 2009

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API